Archive/ The Vault/The Sudarium of Oviedo

The Vault · Relics & Sacred Objects

The Sudarium of Oviedo: The Face-Cloth in the Holy Chamber

In the archive

Held
Cámara Santa, Oviedo Cathedral, Spain
Date evidence
Documented 1075; radiocarbon c. 7th century CE
Era
Era V · Late Antiquity
In the archive
Patristic Christianity · Scholasticism

Three times a year the Cathedral of Oviedo shows a cloth. It is a piece of linen about 84 by 53 centimetres, stained brown and dirty, with no image on it: only blotches of what appear to be blood and fluid, in patterns that have been mapped with great care. The Gospel of John (20:6–7) says that when Peter entered the empty tomb he saw the linen cloths lying there, "and the sudarium that had been on his head, not lying with the linen cloths but rolled up in a place by itself". The Sudarium of Oviedo is venerated as that cloth, wrapped around the dead Jesus's face after the crucifixion.

The face-cloth through time

The Gospel line behind the relic, then its documented history.

καὶ τὸ σουδάριον ὃ ἦν ἐπὶ τῆς κεφαλῆς αὐτοῦ οὐ μετὰ τῶν ὀθονίων κείμενον ἀλλὰ χωρὶς ἐντετυλιγμένον εἰς ἕνα τόπον

  • c. 570 A possible early mention: An anonymous pilgrim from Piacenza mentions a sudarium in Jerusalem. The link to this cloth cannot be demonstrated.
  • 614 Flight from Jerusalem (tradition): Tradition says the cloth left ahead of the Persian conquest and travelled through North Africa to Spain.
  • 9th c. The Holy Chamber: Alfonso II of Asturias builds the Cámara Santa in Oviedo to house relics.
  • 1075 The Arca Santa opened: Alfonso VI, with El Cid among the witnesses, opens the relic chest and has its contents listed: the cloth's firm documentary anchor.
  • 1990 Radiocarbon: Arizona: The linen dates to around the seventh century CE.
  • 1992 Radiocarbon: Toronto: A second test agrees. Defenders argue contamination skews the date; no retest has overturned it.
  • 2007 A later test: Again, a date around the seventh century.

Study the object

Photographs of the cloth belong to the Cathedral of Oviedo and the researchers who made them.

Paste any IIIF manifest into the viewer to study published images; it needs JavaScript.

The documented history

  • Tradition. The cloth left Jerusalem ahead of the Persian conquest of 614, passed through North Africa, and reached Spain. It was carried north to Asturias in a chest of relics, the Arca Santa, ahead of the Muslim conquest.
  • Early references. A possible sixth-century mention (c. 570) by an anonymous pilgrim from Piacenza of a sudarium in Jerusalem is cited by defenders. Its link to this cloth is not demonstrable.
  • Oviedo. King Alfonso II of Asturias built the Cámara Santa (Holy Chamber) in the ninth century to house relics. On 14 March 1075, Alfonso VI, with Rodrigo Díaz, El Cid, among the witnesses, had the Arca Santa opened and its relics listed. This is the cloth's firm documentary anchor.

What studies have found

  • Radiocarbon. Tests have repeatedly dated the linen to around the seventh century CE. They were made at Arizona (1990), Toronto (1992) and in a later test in 2007. Defenders argue that the relic was contaminated by centuries of handling and oil, which could skew the date. No independent re-test has overturned the seventh-century result.
  • The "match" with the Shroud. Researchers of the Spanish Centre for Sindonology have argued that the Sudarium's stain pattern and dimensions correspond to the face on the Shroud of Turin (V04), and that the blood on both is type AB. These claims are contested. The congruence studies have not been independently verified by forensic blood-pattern specialists. Blood typing of ancient, degraded material is unreliable, because AB-like reactions can come from bacterial contamination, a point made by the Shroud chemist Alan Adler.
  • Pollen claims of Middle Eastern origin face the same methodological problems as the Shroud pollen claims.

Symbology

A relic without an image. Unlike the Shroud or the Veil of Veronica (V25), the Sudarium carries no picture. Its sacredness rests entirely on contact: it is a cloth believed to have touched Christ's face. It is a clear example of the contact-relic logic central to medieval devotion.

The rolled cloth. John's detail that the face-cloth was folded apart from the linen became a point of meditation on the orderliness of the resurrection. Christ was not stolen but rose, leaving the cloths set aside.

Connections

The Shroud of Turin (V04), the Veil of Veronica (V25), the True Cross (V15), and Patristic and medieval Christianity (ch22, ch28).

✦ The evidence, honestly

What's well supported by the evidence

  • A stained linen cloth (about 84 × 53 cm) kept in Oviedo, documented at the opening of the Arca Santa in 1075. It has been radiocarbon-dated to about the seventh century in several tests (1990, 1992, 2007).

What is not supported

  • That the cloth is proven to be the sudarium of John 20. Proof of its congruence with the Shroud, and AB blood as meaningful evidence, are also not established.

What's genuinely open

  • Whether contamination could have distorted the radiocarbon results enough to matter.
  • Where the cloth was before 1075.

Sources