Archive/ The Vault/The Piprahwa Relics

The Vault · Relics & Sacred Objects

The Piprahwa Relics: Bones, Jewels and an Inscription

In the archive

Held
Indian Museum, Kolkata; National Museum, New Delhi; gems returned to India in 2025
Date evidence
Stupa deposit c. 3rd–2nd century BCE or earlier (debated)
Era
Era IV · The Axial Age
In the archive
Buddhism · Mahayana Buddhism · Sacred Kingship

In January 1898 William Claxton Peppé, an English estate manager in the Terai of northern India, near the Nepal border, had his workmen dig into a large brick mound on his land at Piprahwa. It was an ancient stupa. About 18 feet down they reached a massive sandstone coffer. Inside were five small vessels: urns and caskets of soapstone and crystal, holding bone fragments, ash, and some 1,800 tiny offerings: pearls, gems, gold leaf and stars, beads and shells. Around the lid of one urn ran a line of writing in the Brahmi script. It seemed to say that these were relics of the Buddha, enshrined by his own people, the Sakyas.

The words around the lid

The urn's inscription in Brahmi letters, given here in transliteration. Touch a word; the key word is the one scholars dispute.

sukiti-bhatinaṃ sa-bhaginikanaṃ sa-puta-dalanaṃ iyaṃ salila-nidhane budhasa bhagavate sakiyanaṃ

This deposit of relics of the Blessed One, the Buddha, is (the pious gift) of the Sakyas, the brothers of Sukiti, with their sisters, sons and wives.

    Study the object

    The relics are held by Indian national museums; images belong to them.

    Paste any IIIF manifest into the viewer to study published images; it needs JavaScript.

    The inscription

    The words are in a Prakrit language, and each can be glossed in the interactive object above. The standard reading:

    This deposit of relics of the Blessed One, the Buddha, is (the gift) of the Sakyas, the brothers of Sukiti, with their sisters, sons and wives.

    The grammar is ambiguous. The genitives can be arranged in more than one way. Soon after the find, the epigrapher J. F. Fleet argued that it could mean the relics of the Sakyas, the kinsmen of the Buddha. On that reading the bones are those of the Buddha's relatives, perhaps victims of the massacre of the Sakyas recorded in Buddhist tradition, and not the Buddha's own. Most scholars since have preferred the reading "relics of the Buddha", while accepting that the text can be taken both ways.

    Is it genuine?

    The find came in the same years that a German archaeologist, Alois Führer, was exposed as a forger of Buddhist inscriptions and relics in the same region. Suspicion inevitably fell on Piprahwa. Investigations, including the historian Charles Allen's study (2008), concluded that Peppé's find was genuine and that Führer did not have the opportunity to plant it. Some doubts about the inscription's date have been raised, but most epigraphers accept it as ancient.

    In 1971–1973 the archaeologist K. M. Srivastava excavated deeper at Piprahwa and found earlier caskets with bone, and at the nearby monastery sealings reading "Kapilavastu", the name of the Buddha's home town. He argued that Piprahwa was Kapilavastu. Nepal identifies Kapilavastu with Tilaurakot, across the border, and the question remains disputed between the two countries.

    Where the relics went

    The British government kept most of the gems and gave the bone relics to King Chulalongkorn of Siam, who shared them among Buddhist communities in Asia. Much of the jewellery went to the Indian Museum in Calcutta (Kolkata). Peppé's family kept a share of the gems.

    In May 2025 Sotheby's in Hong Kong offered the family's gems for sale. The Indian government objected that they were sacred relics and national heritage. Buddhist leaders protested, and the sale was postponed. In July 2025 they were bought by the Godrej group and returned to India, where they are to be displayed.

    Symbology and sacred encoding

    Relics and the stupa. Buddhist tradition says the Buddha's remains were divided into eight portions after his cremation, one of them to the Sakyas of Kapilavastu, each enshrined in a stupa. The stupa became the central monument of Buddhism, a mound whose relic core made the Buddha present.

    Jewels as offerings. The gems, gold stars and flowers were offerings laid with the relics: the seven precious substances of Buddhist tradition, adorning the Buddha's remains as a king's body would be adorned.

    Letters as witness. An inscription at a relic deposit certifies it. The Piprahwa text names the donors so that their merit is recorded with the relic.

    Connections

    Buddhism (ch11), Mahayana Buddhism (ch20) and Sacred Kingship (ch49). Compare the Sacred Tooth Relic (V27), another relic of the Buddha, and the Diamond Sutra (V30).

    ✦ The evidence, honestly

    What's well supported by the evidence

    • In 1898 Peppé excavated a stupa at Piprahwa containing a coffer with bone, urns and some 1,800 gem offerings, and a Brahmi inscription naming the Buddha and the Sakyas.
    • The 2025 Sotheby's sale was halted and the gems returned to India.

    What is not supported

    • That the bones are proven to be the Buddha's. The inscription can be read two ways, and no test could establish identity.
    • That the find was a forgery by Führer. Investigation has not supported that.

    What's genuinely open

    • The reading of the inscription: the Buddha's relics or his kinsmen's.
    • The date of the inscription and the deposit.
    • Whether Piprahwa or Tilaurakot was Kapilavastu.

    Sources

    The find and the inscription

    • Tricycle, "Piprahwa Buddha Relics Returned to India: Selling the Buddha", https://tricycle.org/article/piprahwa-buddha-relics/
    • C. Allen, The Buddha and Dr Führer: An Archaeological Scandal (Haus, 2008)
    • J. F. Fleet, "The Inscription on the Piprahwa Vase", Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1907)
    • K. M. Srivastava, Discovery of Kapilavastu (New Delhi, 1986)

    The 2025 sale