Archive/ Prehistory /The Paleolithic

Interpretive illustrationA stenciled hand-print beside an antlered therianthrope — the two oldest gestures of the sacred imagination, the pressed palm that says “I was here” and the human-animal being who crosses into the spirit world. An original rendering in the idiom of cave art, not a copy of any panel.

Prehistory · The Paleolithic

The Paleolithic

In the archive

The deepest reach of the human religious imagination — tens of thousands of years of painted caves, carved figures, bone flutes, deliberate graves, and a lion-headed man who never walked the earth — and the discipline of saying honestly, across so vast a silence, what the evidence can and cannot tell us about the first faith.

The lion-headed man

In a cave in the Swabian hills of southern Germany, some forty thousand years ago, someone took a mammoth tusk and spent an estimated four hundred hours carving it into a standing figure with the body of a man and the head of a cave lion. The Lion Man of Hohlenstein-Stadel is among the oldest known works of figurative art in the world — and its subject is a being that has never existed. To make it, its carver had to hold in mind a creature that was not in the world but in the imagination: a fusion of human and animal, a thing of another order. That single object tells us something momentous about its maker's mind — that it could imagine the unreal, the more-than-human, the sacred. It is as close as we can come to watching religion being born.

What we can and cannot know

This is the first chapter in time and among the last this book was able to write, and for a reason: the Paleolithic is the era of maximum uncertainty. There are no texts, no recorded myths, no informants — only objects, bones, and painted walls, tens of thousands of years old, from which we try to read a mind. The temptation to over-read is enormous, and the history of the subject is littered with confident interpretations later abandoned. So the honesty that governs this whole book governs this chapter most of all, and it will not be padded: we possess the artifacts of Paleolithic religion; we do not possess its meaning, and much of what is written about it is inference wearing the costume of fact.

What the evidence is

Four kinds of trace suggest that the people of the Old Stone Age had something we would recognize as religion.

  • Deliberate burial. From at least 100,000 years ago, anatomically modern humans buried their dead on purpose, sometimes with ritual care: at Qafzeh and Skhul in Israel, bodies were laid out with pieces of red ochre and, in one case, deer antlers placed in the arms. Far later, the extraordinary graves at Sungir in Russia (c. 34,000 years old) held bodies — including two children — covered in thousands of painstakingly carved ivory beads, with spears of straightened mammoth tusk. To provision the dead is to imagine that death is not simply the end.
  • Cave art. Deep in the caves of France and Spain — Chauvet (c. 36,000 years old), Lascaux, Altamira — Ice Age people painted horses, lions, bison, and aurochs with astonishing skill, often far inside inaccessible chambers, in the dark, where no one lived. Human figures are rare; hand-prints are common; and a few haunting therianthropes — half-human, half-animal, like the "Sorcerer" of Trois-Frères — stare out of the walls.
  • Portable art and music. The Upper Paleolithic left small carvings — above all the "Venus" figurines like the Venus of Willendorf and the 40,000-year-old Venus of Hohle Fels — and, from the same German caves, the world's oldest known musical instruments: five-holed flutes carved from bird bone and mammoth ivory, roughly 40,000 years old, evidence that these people sang and played.
  • The deep record in Africa. The oldest layer is not in Europe at all: the cross-hatched engraved ochre of Blombos Cave in South Africa (c. 73,000 years) and its shell-bead ornaments push symbolic behavior back tens of millennia before the painted caves.

The world's oldest art is not in Europe

For a century the story of Paleolithic religion was written from the caves of France and Spain. That has now changed. On the Indonesian island of Sulawesi, painted scenes have been dated to at least 45,500 years old — and, by a refined technique in 2024, to perhaps 51,000 — including a life-size warty pig (the oldest known figurative painting of an animal) and, at Leang Bulu' Sipong 4, a hunting scene in which small therianthropes — human figures with animal features — confront wild pigs and dwarf buffalo. This is not only the oldest known figurative art but arguably the oldest known narrative art and the oldest therianthrope — tens of thousands of years before the European "Sorcerer." Symbolic, imaginative, possibly religious image-making was a human capacity carried across the world, not a late European invention.

The interpretations, and their limits

What did it mean? Every answer is a hypothesis. The oldest, the Abbé Breuil's idea of sympathetic hunting magic — painting the prey to ensure the kill — has largely fallen from favor. The most influential modern reading, associated with David Lewis-Williams, sees the caves as the setting for shamanism: the therianthropes as shamans in trance-metamorphosis, the geometric marks as the entoptic patterns the brain generates in altered states, the cave wall itself as a membrane to the spirit world. It is a powerful model — and a contested one: critics such as Paul Bahn and Patricia Helvenston argue that the "three stages of trance" framework is over-extended, that the ethnographic and neuropsychological evidence does not bear its universal weight, and that not all rock art need be shamanic at all. Others read totemism, initiation, or ritual bound up with the seasons and the herds. The therianthrope may be a sorcerer, a spirit, a god, or a myth we will never recover. Each interpretation is plausible; none is proven, and the caves keep their secret.

The Venus figurines

The female figurines are a case study in honest uncertainty. For a century they were read as "mother goddesses" and emblems of a fertility cult, and that reading still circulates widely. But it is a modern hypothesis, not an established fact. The figurines vary enormously; the fired-clay Venus of Dolní Věstonice (c. 29,000 years old, among the oldest ceramics on earth) differs sharply from the slender Venus of Lespugue or the featureless Hohle Fels form. Scholars have proposed that some are self-portraits seen from above (Catherine McDermott), some depictions of woven clothing (Olga Soffer), some idealized forms, some dolls or amulets. There is no consensus that they represent a goddess, or a single thing at all. That a naked female figure means "fertility goddess" is an assumption we bring, not a message the Ice Age left.

The Neanderthal question

Did our cousins the Neanderthals have religion? The evidence is real but fiercely contested: apparent deliberate burials (La Chapelle-aux-Saints, and the famous "flower burial" at Shanidar, whose pollen may be the work of burrowing rodents rather than mourners); the use of red ochre and eagle-talon ornaments; cave-wall markings in Spain (La Pasiega, Maltravieso) dated by some to 64,000 years, before modern humans reached the region, though the dating is disputed; and the astonishing Bruniquel Cave, where, some 176,000 years ago, someone deep underground arranged broken stalagmites into deliberate rings — an act whose purpose is utterly unknown. Whether any of this is "symbolic" or "religious," or something for which we have no word, remains genuinely open — as does the still more disputed claim that Homo naledi deliberately deposited its dead in a South African cave hundreds of thousands of years ago.

The believer's lens

Here the "believer" cannot speak — no Paleolithic person left a creed — so this lens is necessarily a reconstruction by analogy, offered as possibility, not fact. When anthropologists look to the religions of recent hunter-gatherers (the San, the peoples of Siberia and the Arctic, Aboriginal Australians), a recurring shape appears: a world that is animate through and through, in which animals, weather, stones, and the dead are persons with whom one is in relationship; in which specialists — what we loosely call shamans — travel in trance between this world and the world of spirits to heal, to find game, and to guide the dead; and in which the boundary between human and animal is porous, crossed in mask and dance and myth. Read through that lens, the painted animals, the therianthropes, the deep dark chambers, and the provisioned graves cohere into something familiar: a religion of relationship with a living cosmos and with the spirits of the animals and the ancestors. This may well be close to what the caves meant. But it is an inference from living peoples projected onto the deep past, and its plausibility is not its proof.

The skeptical lens

The disciplining voice of this chapter is the skeptical one, and it must stay in charge. We have the artifacts; we do not have the beliefs. Every named interpretation — hunting magic, shamanism, totemism, the mother goddess — is a modern hypothesis, and the field's history is a graveyard of confident readings since abandoned. Ethnographic analogy is a tool, but a treacherous one: the San or the Siberian shaman are not living fossils, and to assume that a 40,000-year-old painter thought as they do is to erase forty thousand years of change. The entoptic/shamanic model, for all its influence, has serious critics (Bahn, Helvenston). Even "religion" may be the wrong category — a modern word pressed onto minds we cannot interview. The honest skeptic grants the one thing the evidence compels — that these people made symbolic, imaginative art, and treated death and the deep places of the earth as charged with meaning — and refuses to claim more.

Symbology and sacred encoding

Even here, at the beginning, the human impulse to encode is visible.

  • The therianthrope — the human-animal hybrid of the Lion Man, the Sulawesi hunters, and the painted "sorcerers" — is perhaps the first symbol ever made: the sign of a crossing between the human and the more-than-human, which will reappear in the animal-headed gods of Egypt (Chapter 2) and the shape-shifting shamans of a hundred later traditions.
  • The hand-print, stenciled in blown ochre across cave walls from France to Sulawesi, is the oldest human signature — a pressed palm that says I was here, and perhaps that the rock face was a surface one could reach through.
  • Red ochre is the deepest thread of all: used to redden bodies and graves from over 100,000 years ago (Qafzeh), and engraved with deliberate cross-hatched patterns at Blombos some 73,000 years ago — the earliest known abstract mark-making, the first flicker of encoded meaning, long before the painted caves of Europe.
  • And the cave itself was encoded space: the art clusters, acoustic studies suggest, where the chambers most resonate — the deep, dark, singing places treated as thresholds to another world, and now the flutes tell us that world had music.

Connections

The Paleolithic is the root system of everything that follows in this book. Its ancestor-honor and animate spirit-world survive, living, in the African traditions (Chapter 33) and the diaspora religions (Chapter 40) of the modern era; its shamanism is the same current that runs, if the analogy holds, through Norse seiðr (Chapter 23), Sámi drumming, and Vodou possession; its therianthropes anticipate the gods of Egypt; its red ochre and provisioned graves are the first chapter of the human refusal to accept death as the end — a refusal every later religion inherits. It flows directly into the Neolithic of the next chapter, when settled farming would give the sacred its first temples. Written near last, it stands first: the silent foundation on which the whole archive is built.

✦ The evidence, honestly

Well-supported by evidence

The artifacts themselves — the dated cave art of Europe (Chauvet, Lascaux, Altamira) and of Sulawesi (figurative and narrative art by ~45,000+ years); the Venus figurines and the Lion Man; the world's oldest flutes (Hohle Fels); the deliberate burials with grave-goods (Qafzeh/Skhul ~100,000 years; Sungir); and the very ancient use of red ochre and abstract engraving (Blombos, ~73,000 years). That Paleolithic humans made symbolic, imaginative art is not in doubt.

Not supported (as established fact)

That we know what any of it meant. The "Mother Goddess" of the Venus figurines, the specific shamanic/entoptic reading of the cave art (seriously contested by Bahn and Helvenston), Breuil's "hunting magic" — these are interpretations, some more plausible than others, none confirmed. Claims that assert the meaning of Paleolithic religion with confidence are claiming more than the evidence allows.

Genuinely open

Almost everything about meaning: what the caves were for, what the figurines represented, what the dead were provisioned for. Whether the Neanderthals (or Homo naledi) had religion at all. And the deepest question — how far back the religious imagination reaches, and whether its first spark was 40,000 years ago, or 100,000, or older still.

Sources

Walk this chapter’s room in the Museum (beta) →